Halifax Apartment Builder Risk: Variance vs As-of-Right - Which Path Is Safer?

published on 14 September 2025

Building a multi-unit rental property in Halifax comes down to a crucial decision: as-of-right development or variance applications. Each path has distinct impacts on your project's timeline, costs, and risks. Here's what you need to know:

  • As-of-Right Development:
    • Follows existing zoning rules.
    • Offers predictable timelines, lower costs, and minimal public involvement.
    • Limited design flexibility but safer for securing financing.
  • Variance Applications:
    • Allows flexibility to exceed zoning limits (e.g., height, density).
    • Involves public hearings, longer timelines, and higher costs.
    • Carries greater risk of delays and financing uncertainty.

Quick Comparison

Factor As-of-Right Construction Variance Application
Timeline Predictable, shorter Longer, discretionary reviews
Cost Lower, more predictable Higher, less predictable
Public Involvement Minimal Required, may delay approval
Flexibility Limited by zoning rules Allows zoning modifications
Financing Easier to secure Riskier, may deter lenders

Choosing the right path depends on your goals. If you value speed and certainty, stick with as-of-right. If your property has unique potential and you're prepared for delays, consider a variance. For smoother execution, working with an integrated design-build team can help manage risks and keep your project on track.

HALIFAX Home Owners May Have Just Won THE LOTTERY : Halifax Proposed Zoning Changes January 2024

As-of-Right Construction: Clear Rules, Limited Options

As-of-right construction provides a straightforward approval process, eliminating much of the guesswork that comes with seeking special permissions. If your multi-unit project aligns with existing zoning bylaws, municipal staff can approve it without the need for discretionary reviews. This predictable process stands in contrast to the more uncertain nature of variance approvals.

The trade-off is simple: regulatory certainty comes at the expense of design flexibility. Your project must fit within the zoning parameters already in place, which might not maximize your property’s potential. For those prioritizing schedule reliability and cost control, as-of-right development often feels like the safer bet.

How As-of-Right Approval Works

In Halifax, the as-of-right approval process begins with ensuring your project adheres to all zoning requirements. This includes factors like building height, lot coverage, setbacks, and density limits outlined in the municipality’s Land Use By-law. Meeting these requirements is non-negotiable.

Once compliance is confirmed, the next step is submitting a building permit application. This involves providing plans and reports that demonstrate adherence to both the National Building Code and local regulations. For standard multi-unit projects, this process follows a predictable timeline. Municipal planners review your plans for zoning compliance, while building inspectors focus on structural and safety standards.

Even for as-of-right projects, a development agreement may be required, particularly for properties with a higher number of units. However, these agreements typically follow standard templates and don’t involve the lengthy negotiations often seen with variance applications.

Because municipal staff rely on established procedures and there’s no need for public hearings or extensive community consultations, the approval timeline remains consistent. This predictability can simplify financing, as lenders appreciate the certainty of a clear approval schedule.

Benefits of As-of-Right Construction

One of the biggest advantages of as-of-right construction is its predictable timeline. This reliability makes it easier to plan schedules, coordinate contractors, order materials, and secure financing without worrying about unexpected delays.

Lower regulatory costs are another appealing factor. By avoiding expenses like planning consultant fees, legal representation for public hearings, and repeated design revisions, you can reduce overall project costs.

Lenders also tend to view as-of-right developments as lower-risk due to the clarity of the approval process. This perception can lead to better interest rates and loan terms, making funding easier to secure.

Another advantage is the lack of public hearings, which eliminates potential delays caused by community opposition. This keeps projects moving forward as planned.

Additionally, as long as your project remains compliant, permit renewals are typically straightforward.

Drawbacks of As-of-Right Construction

The main downside to as-of-right construction is its lack of design flexibility. Your project must conform to existing zoning rules, which can limit your ability to fully optimize the site. This may affect the number of units, the layout of the property, or access to natural light.

Height restrictions, for example, might prevent you from taking advantage of scenic views or creating a more varied mix of unit sizes that tenants might prefer. Similarly, parking requirements could take up valuable space that might otherwise be used for additional units or amenities.

Another challenge is the rigidity during construction. If unexpected site conditions arise, making design changes without triggering the need for a variance can be difficult. This inflexibility may lead to costly redesigns or delays if adjustments become necessary.

Ultimately, the decision comes down to weighing these limitations against the benefits of regulatory certainty. For many Halifax property owners, particularly those new to multi-unit development, the streamlined and reliable as-of-right process strikes a practical balance. It offers a safer and simpler alternative to the risks and complexities of variance applications, helping to minimize construction challenges in Halifax.

Variance Applications: More Options, More Risk

Variance applications allow property owners to request adjustments to zoning rules, opening the door to new development possibilities. However, this flexibility comes with its own set of challenges. The process requires discretionary approval from the Halifax Regional Municipality Council, which involves multiple layers of review and public input. These steps can disrupt well-planned projects, complicating financing, timelines, and budgets. Below, we break down Halifax's variance process and its potential risks.

Halifax Variance Application Steps

The process starts with creating a Customer Portal Account through the Halifax Permitting, Planning, Licensing and Compliance (PPL&C) system [1]. Before submitting the application online, contact Planning and Development at 902-490-4472 to confirm the required documentation [1].

  1. Initial Preparation
    Gather essential materials, including site plans, architectural drawings, and documents explaining why the variance is necessary. These should demonstrate why the project cannot meet existing Land Use By-law requirements, such as those related to lot coverage, setbacks, or building height [1].
  2. Online Submission
    Submit the required documents and pay the applicable fees through the PPL&C portal. Municipal staff will review the application for completeness before advancing it for evaluation.
  3. Public Notification
    Neighbouring property owners are informed about the proposal and given an opportunity to review and comment. Their feedback can influence the outcome of the application.
  4. Staff Review and Recommendation
    Municipal planners assess the application against established criteria, considering factors like neighbourhood compatibility and alignment with planning policies. They then prepare a report with their recommendation for Council.
  5. Council Decision
    At a public meeting, Council members vote on the application. Applicants can present their case, while community members may express support or concerns.
  6. Potential Appeals
    If the Council’s decision is contested by either the applicant or the community, the process may be extended, leading to delays and additional legal costs.

Understanding these steps highlights where delays and cost increases can arise, helping applicants better prepare for potential hurdles.

Why Property Owners Choose Variances

One of the main reasons property owners pursue variances is to maximize a property's potential when standard zoning rules are too restrictive. For properties with unique features or challenges, variances can provide the flexibility needed to tailor a design that works better for the site.

Variance Risks and Problems

While variances offer design flexibility, they also come with notable risks that can impact project outcomes.

Extended Approval Timelines
Since the process is discretionary, securing a variance often takes significantly longer than projects that comply with existing zoning rules. Lengthy reviews, public consultations, and potential appeals can push back timelines and inflate costs.

Public Opposition
During the public notification phase, neighbours may raise concerns about issues like parking, privacy, or the building’s appearance. Strong opposition can sway Council’s decision or force costly design changes.

Financial and Financing Uncertainty
Variance applications require upfront investments in planning, legal advice, and application fees, with no guarantee of approval. Extended timelines can increase carrying costs, and the uncertainty of the process may make lenders hesitant, potentially leading to higher interest rates or stricter financing conditions.

While variances can unlock new possibilities by allowing deviations from zoning rules, they also introduce risks that shouldn’t be overlooked. Balancing the potential benefits against the likelihood of delays, added costs, and even rejection is crucial for making an informed decision.

sbb-itb-16b8a48

Side-by-Side Comparison: Variance vs As-of-Right

Understanding the differences between variance and as-of-right construction can shed light on project risks, costs, and timelines.

Risk Comparison: Variance vs As-of-Right

Here's a quick breakdown of how these two approaches differ:

Factor As-of-Right Construction Variance Application
Approval Timeline Generally follows a clear municipal process with predictable timing Involves discretionary reviews, often leading to extended timelines
Approval Certainty High when zoning requirements are met Lower due to the subjective nature of the review process
Public Input Limited public involvement Requires public notifications and consultations, which may cause delays
Appeal Risk Low, typically related to technical compliance Higher, as decisions can be appealed by community members
Cost Predictability Costs are easier to estimate and confirm early Less predictable, with potential for added fees and revisions
Design Flexibility Restricted by existing zoning rules Allows for requests to modify zoning requirements
Financing Impact Often preferred by lenders due to its predictability Can be less appealing to lenders because of the uncertainties involved

In short, as-of-right construction offers more predictability in timelines and costs, while variance applications come with risks like delays and additional expenses but allow for greater design flexibility.

Which Approach to Choose

Your project goals and circumstances will guide which path makes the most sense.

Go with As-of-Right if:

  • Your project can meet all current zoning requirements.
  • You need a predictable timeline to secure financing or meet income targets.
  • Minimizing regulatory risk is a top priority.
  • The property can be developed profitably under existing rules.

Opt for a Variance Application if:

  • Zoning restrictions significantly limit the potential of the property.
  • You need flexibility in design that zoning rules don’t allow.
  • You’re financially prepared for a longer, more uncertain approval process.
  • Market conditions make waiting for a variance worthwhile.

Other factors, like irregular lot shapes, tricky terrain, or unique neighbourhood characteristics, can also play a role in your decision. Bringing in an integrated design-build team early can help you weigh both options, assess zoning constraints, and choose the approach that best balances risk and reward.

Common Property Owner Mistakes

Avoid these common errors when deciding your construction approach:

  • Underestimating variance timelines: This can lead to delays, higher carrying costs, and postponed income.
  • Overlooking as-of-right possibilities: Some assume a variance is necessary without exploring what’s achievable within existing zoning.
  • Failing to budget for unexpected fees: Additional costs during the approval process can strain your budget.
  • Ignoring community dynamics: Not considering local opinions can lead to opposition during public consultations.

Working with separate teams for zoning and construction often compounds these issues. An integrated design-build team, on the other hand, can provide a seamless evaluation of both options, ensuring you have all the information you need to make an informed decision.

Integrated Construction: Lower Risk for Halifax Property Owners

Building multi-unit rental properties has traditionally meant hiring separate teams for planning, design, engineering, and construction. While this may seem straightforward, it often leads to coordination issues, budget overruns, and delays - challenges that can seriously affect a project’s profitability. The integrated design-build approach offers a better alternative by bringing all these professionals together under one contract, ensuring a single point of accountability.

How Integrated Design-Build Reduces Risk

When zoning analysis, design, engineering, and construction are handled by separate entities, miscommunication and mismatched priorities frequently arise. These gaps can result in unnecessary costs, delays, and frustration. For instance, a design that doesn’t align with engineering realities or unforeseen site conditions can derail timelines and inflate budgets.

By contrast, an integrated design-build firm takes charge of the entire process, from start to finish. This approach minimizes change orders, simplifies accountability, and allows for quick problem-solving. In Halifax, where zoning regulations can be particularly intricate, this unified model is invaluable. It enables simultaneous consideration of both variance and as-of-right options, ensuring that your design aligns with construction requirements early in the process. This streamlined collaboration is especially helpful as Halifax’s zoning rules continue to evolve.

Fixed Prices and Timeline Guarantees

One of the biggest financial risks in multi-unit construction comes from budget overruns and delayed timelines. Traditional cost-plus contracts often leave property owners facing unforeseen expenses, sometimes exceeding initial budgets by 30–60%. With a fixed-price contract, costs are locked in from the beginning, removing surprises related to material prices, labour, or coordination issues. This certainty is critical for securing financing and accurately projecting your return on investment.

Timeline guarantees further protect your bottom line. For example, penalties of up to $1,000 per day for delays can help ensure your project stays on schedule. This is particularly important for rental properties, where delays can significantly impact your income. For a fourplex, monthly rental income might average $8,800 - a timeline guarantee ensures you don’t lose out on that revenue.

Take Helio Urban Development as an example. As Nova Scotia’s only integrated design-build firm specializing in 4+ unit rental properties, they offer a fixed price of $160,000 per unit and a guaranteed six-month construction timeline. Their projects boast $0 in cost overruns, a stark contrast to the industry norm.

Halifax Zoning Expertise Matters

Navigating Halifax’s zoning regulations can be tricky, especially with frequent changes and complexities. Firms without local expertise risk costly mistakes, whether applying for a variance or building as-of-right. Understanding the nuances of Halifax’s zoning processes is crucial for accurate risk assessment and timeline management.

Local knowledge goes hand-in-hand with fixed pricing and schedule guarantees. Experts familiar with Halifax’s zoning landscape can anticipate potential hurdles, like which municipal staff handle specific applications, typical review timelines, and common approval conditions. This insight helps avoid delays and missteps that can derail a project.

Helio Urban Development serves clients across municipalities within a 90-minute radius of Halifax, leveraging their deep regional zoning expertise. This local knowledge, combined with their integrated approach, ensures that your project aligns with both regulatory requirements and construction realities from the outset. The result? Fewer surprises, smoother approvals, and a project that stays on track.

Conclusion: Picking the Right Approach

Key Points for Halifax Property Owners

If you own property in Halifax, balancing regulatory certainty with design flexibility is crucial to safeguarding your investment. As-of-right development provides a clear path forward, as it adheres entirely to existing zoning regulations. This approach avoids discretionary reviews, giving you predictable development rights and speeding up approval processes.

On the other hand, pursuing variances can drag out approval timelines and often comes with conditions that may restrict your design options. Discretionary approvals also tend to include strict "sunset clauses", which set firm deadlines for starting and finishing your project.

Timing is everything. If you don’t secure construction permits before new Land Use By-laws come into effect, your project could be subjected to updated requirements, potentially altering your development rights. The Centre Plan was created to clarify these rules, making as-of-right development the preferred option by reducing the need for case-by-case changes [2].

Choosing the right approach now can help you minimize risks and keep your project on track.

How Integrated Construction Reduces Risk

Integrated construction offers a smart way to manage both costs and timelines. By combining zoning, design, and construction under one contract, this design-build method avoids the miscommunications that can lead to costly delays.

From the beginning, an integrated process ensures your design aligns with zoning rules and construction realities. Fixed-price contracts and strict deadlines keep your budget and schedule intact. For example, a typical fourplex generating $8,000 to $8,400 in monthly rental income can quickly lose profitability if even minor delays occur.

Having local zoning expertise is key to making the right decisions. An integrated design-build team with Halifax-specific knowledge can deliver fixed-price projects on time, reducing risks and uncertainties.

FAQs

What are the risks and advantages of applying for a variance versus building as-of-right for a multi-unit rental property in Halifax?

When you're considering development in Halifax, applying for a variance can provide some wiggle room by allowing projects that don't strictly adhere to current zoning regulations. This can pave the way for more ambitious designs or larger-scale developments. However, it’s not without its challenges. Approval timelines can be unpredictable, there's always the chance of rejection, and you’ll need to factor in extra costs like application fees. Plus, if appeals come into play, delays could stretch even further, potentially impacting both your budget and project schedule.

In contrast, as-of-right development offers a more straightforward and predictable route. By sticking to the existing zoning rules, you significantly lower the risk of rejection and avoid drawn-out approval processes. While this approach might restrict your design options and require you to work within tighter zoning boundaries, it ensures a more seamless journey to construction. For property owners who value efficiency and certainty, this option is often the better choice.

How does a design-build approach reduce risks with Halifax zoning regulations compared to traditional methods?

The design-build method plays a key role in reducing risks associated with Halifax's zoning regulations by encouraging early collaboration between designers and builders. This proactive teamwork ensures that projects meet ER3 zoning requirements - such as building types, design standards, and permitted uses - right from the outset. As a result, it helps avoid expensive revisions or unexpected delays down the line.

By combining the planning, design, and construction stages into one seamless process, this approach can significantly cut project timelines. What might typically take 12–18 months can often be completed in just 6 months. Additionally, it offers fixed costs and guaranteed delivery schedules, providing property owners with greater certainty and minimizing the chances of financial or regulatory surprises.

What should property owners consider when choosing between an as-of-right development and a variance application in Halifax?

Property owners must weigh the pros and cons of choosing between as-of-right development and variance applications. With as-of-right projects, everything aligns perfectly with existing zoning rules. This means quicker approvals, lower costs, and a smoother, more predictable process. For many, this straightforward approach reduces risks and keeps things moving efficiently.

On the flip side, applying for a variance gives you more room to customise your design, making it easier to meet specific project goals. But this flexibility comes at a price - longer approval timelines, additional expenses, and the challenges of public notification requirements, which can slow things down and add layers of complexity. Deciding between these options boils down to your priorities: is speed and certainty your main focus, or do you need the adaptability a variance offers? Consulting local experts can help you make the right call for your project.

Related Blog Posts

Read more